• Short guides to forum navigation, searching, posting, translation, alerts and notifications viewable by clicking here.
  • Türk dostlarımıza hoş geldiniz Giriş burada.
  • Scammers are running ads on Facebook and Instagram claiming a giveaway. DO NOT OPEN THESE LINKS AND LOG IN. See this thread: here

Hugely important news from Andy in next week's episode

Amphius

Member
"The next meeting of the BRICS Finance Track at the level of finance ministers and central bank governors is scheduled for 27 Feb"

Andrew, is this the meeting, 2 weeks today, where the launch details and name of the new BRICS gold-backed token will be decided? If so, could you wait until you have the lowdown before recording the next episode ("I really do hope to provide more information on the launch of this gold-backed currency, and its name, by 1st March")?
Untitled.png
 
...and here...

"Since the fund was created, Coleman had stored the invested precious metals in various vaults throughout the United States. However, Coleman desired to build his own vault and ultimately did so in 2010, after defrauding Street Search, and using Street Search's money for the construction. (Ex. G.)"

An excerpt from the transcript
 
Last edited:
Yes, the quickest thing may be to go to the end and read the emails that prospective clients, recognisable names in US society, sent to Bob.
 
Yes, the quickest thing may be to go to the end and read the emails that prospective clients, recognisable names in US society, sent to Bob.
So, let me briefly explain why I ask these questions. I try to do this as often as I can whenever I hear someone that seems in some way to be on the "right" side of some important topic or situation or policy or whatever ("right" obvious being subjective on my part) either being disrespected or attacked or put down -- I try to be careful before I join in.

One of the best ways of destroying what is good -- esp. movements -- is internal strife, getting those within the movement to start accentuating their differences and not their commonalities. We "truth-seekers" are good at times at being very stringent in what we'll allow or accept from someone that we consider "on our side" and separating ourselves from otherwise comrades-in-arms. Some of that is very good. Sometimes it's not, or it's done w/o really knowing the truth.

I've been around a while and have learned that the hard way. So now, when I hear or read these things, I'm looking for the sauce, not only for myself, but for others I might have influenced, especially if and when I find that the accusations are true, or worse, and that I've been deceived about or by the person.

Certainly sounds as though BC is not a trustworthy person. Does he have anything worthwhile to offer? Don't know ... he seems to have shot himself in the foot.

But likewise, I don't like hyperbole, esp. when those hyperbolic declarations or predictions don't happen or turn out not to be the full truth, and especially when it comes from those on "our" side as it tends to set them and us up for disrespect from those we are trying to convince to join our side.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlM
All agreed. I have a greater aversion to those who pretend to be sweetly reasonable on "our" team, but who actually have a clear agenda based on a conventional storage business model obviously blown out of the water forever by Kinesis. Hence friendly, helpful Bob.

I long ago gave up believing what people say and have come to rely only on documents that can be disclosed in court.

However, when looking to invest a small amount of funds three years ago, I found online videos invaluable in assessing whether people were telling the truth, consistently. Sound alone is also useful in revealing things, especially the unintended details. This was useful when looking at junior mining companies, Kinesis and even crypto propositions.

This comes from years of verifying offers of oil on the secondary market. After years I found two people (literally about 1 in 1,000) who’ve proved genuine and capable, years later. Equally they’re happy to trust me with their passports, bank details and so on.

There are other ways of finding out the truth, but suffice to say I’m here and cannot see a reason, just now, to leave.

One thing I’ve picked up is that people begin to act differently when put under pressure, even just commercial pressure. We’re beginning to see that behaviour now.
 
All agreed. I have a greater aversion to those who pretend to be sweetly reasonable on "our" team, but who actually have a clear agenda based on a conventional storage business model obviously blown out of the water forever by Kinesis. Hence friendly, helpful Bob.

I long ago gave up believing what people say and have come to rely only on documents that can be disclosed in court.

However, when looking to invest a small amount of funds three years ago, I found online videos invaluable in assessing whether people were telling the truth, consistently. Sound alone is also useful in revealing things, especially the unintended details. This was useful when looking at junior mining companies, Kinesis and even crypto propositions.

This comes from years of verifying offers of oil on the secondary market. After years I found two people (literally about 1 in 1,000) who’ve proved genuine and capable, years later. Equally they’re happy to trust me with their passports, bank details and so on.

There are other ways of finding out the truth, but suffice to say I’m here and cannot see a reason, just now, to leave.

One thing I’ve picked up is that people begin to act differently when put under pressure, even just commercial pressure. We’re beginning to see that behaviour now.
Under enough pressure, lots of people can become savages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlM
All agreed. I have a greater aversion to those who pretend to be sweetly reasonable on "our" team, but who actually have a clear agenda based on a conventional storage business model obviously blown out of the water forever by Kinesis. Hence friendly, helpful Bob.

I long ago gave up believing what people say and have come to rely only on documents that can be disclosed in court.

However, when looking to invest a small amount of funds three years ago, I found online videos invaluable in assessing whether people were telling the truth, consistently. Sound alone is also useful in revealing things, especially the unintended details. This was useful when looking at junior mining companies, Kinesis and even crypto propositions.

This comes from years of verifying offers of oil on the secondary market. After years I found two people (literally about 1 in 1,000) who’ve proved genuine and capable, years later. Equally they’re happy to trust me with their passports, bank details and so on.

There are other ways of finding out the truth, but suffice to say I’m here and cannot see a reason, just now, to leave.

One thing I’ve picked up is that people begin to act differently when put under pressure, even just commercial pressure. We’re beginning to see that behaviour now.
Well said. (y) And believe me, I can be (and tend to be) as cynical as they come. That's why I have to force myself to always look a little deeper before I allow myself to give in to my cynicism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlM
Bob Coleman's motto:

"Our vaults are ARMORED, the Bullions like that, its got what they crave.."
 
Yes, once people read this, the question becomes how and why this would *not* be deployed? Your discussion elicited the link, so H/T to you @Lozion

It's all there and tried many times successfully before in history, but *never* by a large group of nations with a *legal* treaty.

All anchored by 40% physical gold and it fi ts Kinesisike a glove:

 

Translate

Back
Top